The LEGENDS series, edited by Robert Silverberg

When Legends: Short Novels by the Masters of Modern Fantasy appeared in 1998, edited by Robert Silverberg, I remember seeing it in bookstores, but otherwise didn't pay it much mind. Mostly, the novella by Robert Jordan caught my eye. Well, during my final read of Brandon Sanderson's completion of The Wheel of Time, I was waiting around for my amazon copy of the final book to arrive and decided to give that Jordan novella a shot. So I went down to Bookman's, got it (in 3 volumes for the paperback edition), and breezed through the eleven stories.

The quality of these novellas, however, varied so widely that I'm now going to grade them for fun. The only novella I skipped was King's, since I'd like to read The Dark Tower first. Otherwise, here goes:
  1. Stephen King: "The Little Sisters of Eluria" (The Dark Tower)
    • skipped.
  2. Terry Goodkind: "Debt of Bones" (The Sword of Truth)
    • Grade: C+ 
    • Commentary: Not awful, I suppose, but too slick and shallow for my taste. Reminds me why I only got through half the first book of Goodkind's Sword of Truth.
  3. Orson Scott Card: "Grinning Man" (The Tales of Alvin Maker)
    • Grade: B
    • Commentary: Nice little story -- and, while not quite my thing, the ending is a classic American tall tale. Never read this series before, but it does seem amusing, at least.
  4. Robert Silverberg: "The Seventh Shrine" (Majipoor)
    • Grade: B 
    • Commentary: Another competent story -- though hardly ambitious -- from a series I hadn't previously encountered. Okay, overall.
  5. Ursula K. Le Guin: "Dragonfly" (Earthsea)
    • Grade: A+
    • Commentary: Wonderful; powerful; evocative. Le Guin at her best, as always.
  6. Raymond E. Feist: "The Wood Boy" (The Riftwar Cycle)
    • Grade: C-
    • Commentary: I've read a lot of Feist, but only when younger, and I'm wondering if all his work was similarly ham-handed. Some negative points for the "bitch woman" theme I remember from his The Serpentwar Saga.
  7. Terry Pratchett: "The Sea and Little Fishes" (Discworld)
    • Grade: B
    • Commentary: Pratchett's great . . . but it's also hard for me to distinguish his stuff from each other. All of it is so consistently, well, Pratchett.
  8. George R. R. Martin: "The Hedge Knight" (A Song of Ice and Fire)
    • Grade: A+
    • Commentary: Along with Le Guin's "Dragonfly," this novella was the pinnacle of this collection. Martin at his best. If I ever teach Martin in a fantasy class, I'd probably use this short work as indicative of everything that Martin does well for the fantasy genre.
  9. Tad Williams: "The Burning Man" (Memory, Sorrow and Thorn)
    • Grade: A-
    • Commentary: Got through the first two books of this series, but somehow never finished the third. This novella gets bonus points for some genuine emotional depth.
  10. Anne McCaffrey: "Runner of Pern" (Dragonriders of Pern)
    • Grade: D-
    • Commentary: The sheer awfulness of this story is what first gave me the idea to grade these things. Again, I've read a lot of Pern books, but not since my teenage years. Somehow, I'm doubting that they would've held up well.
  11. Robert Jordan: "New Spring" (The Wheel of Time)
    • Grade: B-
    • Commentary: As a story  . . .  this was okay. It just didn't seem about anything important; though; just some random fleshing-out backstory for The Wheel of Time that we didn't really need. It does contain the cool nugget that Moiraine thinks Cadsuane is a Darkfriend, and for the life of me I can't remember if that's mentioned in WoT.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall
Read more

A Good Week For Publication

So, wow. The Journal of Tolkien Research has just published my article, " Harken Not to Wild Beasts: Between Rage and Eloquence in Saruman and Thrasymachus ." What astounds me is that I finished the piece only two weeks ago and already got back the peer reviews. Of course, no real reason WHY the review process has to take months, but it just usually does. Kudos to the anonymous reviewers, great praise upon them, for working so quickly. I might even more appreciative of their promptness than of their kind remarks; I barely had to do any revisions to the article. The process went so fast, in fact, that the publication barely feels real. One of the great advantages of an online open-access journal, too, is instantaneous publication. As I'm learning with the several other articles I have in circulation, the publication process generally takes even longer than the review process. Anyway, this has been a good week. I finished my review of Harry Potter essays, and the edito
Read more