Gail Z. Martin's THE SUMMONER

For someone who studies fantasy, particularly epic fantasy, I realize that I don't particularly read a lot of epic fantasy. At least stuff written after the year 2000, anyway. So, after reading C. Palmer-Patel's The Shape of Fantasy: Investigating the Structure of American Heroic Epic Fantasy (Routledge, 2020), a worthwhile structuralist account of the genre, I made the concerted effort to read Gail Z. Martin's The Summoner (2007), the first book in her Chronicles of the Necromancer series. Considering that this book is about -- wait for it -- a necromancer, it was a natural starting point for Palmer-Patel's chapter on the heroic epic hero's confrontation with death.

I'll divide this quick review into the good and the bad.

THE GOOD
  • It's epic fantasy mixed with ghost stories! 
  • The cover of the book is sweet.
  • Um, vampires? I think there's vampires, at least according to GoodReads, since I didn't bother reading much past 200 pages. But vampires are cool.
THE BAD
  • Pretty much everything.
The good guys are . . . good, I guess? But let's go with bland instead. The hero-prince-necromancer fella never achieves any more depth than "lead protagonist." There's a bard, and a fighter / guardsman, and a mercenary whom Martin vainly attempts to make sound mysterious and grimdark hard. The evil usurper prince is just as bland, a figure who twirls his mustache and hates upon the common people with almost every sentence he utters. Sadly, The Summoner just repeats every genre fantasy trope. Beyond the ghosts and a thinly described multi-aspect Goddess figure, there's just nothing original or competent here. And those ghosts, btw, are not scary or even spooky. In fact, I had a tough time wondering why all the main characters were superstitious, given that this storyworld seemed pretty chill with the concepts of ghosts otherwise. The prince-necromancer dude keeps wondering to excess what his friends will think once they discover his abilities, but nothing ever comes from this plot point.

The writing itself is just bad, filled with clunky dialogue, wearisome exposition, and characters who "chuckle" or "grin" every other paragraph. The jokes are heavily forced "Oh this character likes pretty girls! This character likes drinking!" types of things. Video game fantasy jokes, basically. And evidently Martin decided that tension, suspense, and horror are simply extraneous concepts when dealing with an epic fantasy ghost story.

So, needless to say, I think I'll be skipping the rest. But sometimes reading a book like this, which is so amateurish that I cannot believe an editor ever found it publishable, makes me wonder why I've devoted so much scholarly concern to epic fantasy.***

----------------
***
But then, last week, I read Brandon Sanderson's Warbreaker, and I remember again how awesome the genre can be in the hands a good writer.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony . And even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, I guarantee you'll never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two dis
Read more

Thoughts upon Reading Tolkien's New & Expanded LETTERS

So, I'm reading through the newly expanded version of Tolkien's Letters. One thing I hadn't properly realized is that these letters were part of Carpenter's original manuscript back in 1981, but Carpenter had to cut them due to cost. Turns out that Carpenter had a pretty keen eye on what could bear cutting -- most of this new stuff isn't terribly interesting, but I discovered a few nuggets. VINDICATED!! (Me, sorta) Naturally, whenever you read new primary material, your first instinct is to check to see if anything contradicts something you've said in print ... especially biographically. Well, I've made three big "biographical" claims, and here's my sigh of relief: Concerning my claim that, in 1954, Tolkien and colleagues contrived to create CS Lewis's academic chair at Cambridge in exchange for them nominating EM Forster for the Nobel Prize. Nothing in  Letters  supports or contradicts this. In my recent article for  Notes & Queries ,
Read more

Uncovering CS Lewis's First Religious Poem

 So, with my article's official acceptance by the journal English Text Construction , it's time to let the cat out of the bag. Using a combination of metrical analysis and biography, I've ascertained with near perfect certainty the first religious poem C. S. Lewis poem ever wrote .... a short poem, "Sweet Desire," that scholars have never previously paid any attention to. This poem is firmly datable to early 1930, probably January or February is my guess, and given the poem's subject matter, it's clearly talking about CSL's fears and intellectual trepidation about becoming a theist and abandoning atheism for good. It's basically Lewis's version of Caedmon's Hymn . The full metrical details will have to await my article, but one interesting caveat on my claims to firstness. In my peer reviewer's commentary, they recommended I contact a CSL scholar named  Charlie W. Starr, who's been working on Lewis's handwriting for quite a lon
Read more