Karen Miller's THE INNOCENT MAGE

Unlike Gail Z. Martin's The Summoner (see last entry), I actually finished this book (2005), the first in Karen Miller's Kingmaker, Kingbreaker series. This one I discovered not through C. Palmer-Patel's book on heroic epic fantasy but through an essay by Edward James on the fantasy trilogy. Alas, even though I finished this book, curtesy of some hardcore skimming, it was just as awful and poorly written.

THE GOOD
  • Miller has a gift for dialect. She gives the main character, Asher, a pretty cool working class accent. Words like "slumskumbledy" are just hilarious.
  • The cover's pretty cool
    •  . . . although, note, see how I'm trying to pad out this list with comments about the cover)
THE BAD
  • As with The Summoner, "the bad" is everything else.
The main villain, when he comes 5/6 of the way through the book, is another one of those cardboard mustache-twirlers. (Seriously, some archetypal villains such as Stephen R. Donaldson's Lord Foul can work, but Miller and Martin aren't even going for archetypal.) There's a prophecy, too, which apparently explains how Asher achieves any success despite being an unlikeable nitwit. Pro tip: if you find yourself invoking a prophecy every time you wish to explain what will happen in the next few chapters, you're not going to create much tension or interest.

But the plot itself is just cheesy and un-stomachable. Here's a depressingly accurate synopsis of the book's first half (borrowed from reader Beth over at GoodReads):
  • Asher runs away to find his fortune in the Capitol. Asher sees the prince riding through town. "Man, that guy is an idiot."
  • Prince seems to recognize Asher. Prince: "Hey what are you doing here?"
  • Asher, "None of your business."
  • Prince, "I like you, want to work in my stables although obviously you can't handle a horse and you are impertinent?"
  • Asher, "Why would I want to do that though I have no other options and no skills?"
  • Prince, "I'll pay you well."
  • Asher, "I want more."
  • Prince, "Done!"
  • Asher somehow makes friends though he is just as rude and coarse with everyone else.
  • Prince, "Asher, I want to you come help me judge a special case at court."
  • Asher, "You're an idiot."
  • Asher sees the case where a man is obviously taking money from his innocent cousin.
  • Prince, "What should I do?"
  • Asher, "The guy is an idiot." Prince, "You are such a great judge of character." Asher, "You are an idiot."
  • Prince, "Yes, unrivaled judge of character. Will you be my first and most trusted adviser?"
  • Asher, "Why would I want to make twice as much money and be so privileged?"
    •  (And here poor beleaguered Beth from GoodReads stops reading the book.)
Incidentally, both The Innocent Mage and The Summoner received awful ratings over at GoodReads. I've never really gotten into the site, but I'm discovering that it does have some pretty savvy reader commentary on there.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony . And even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, I guarantee you'll never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two dis
Read more

Thoughts upon Reading Tolkien's New & Expanded LETTERS

So, I'm reading through the newly expanded version of Tolkien's Letters. One thing I hadn't properly realized is that these letters were part of Carpenter's original manuscript back in 1981, but Carpenter had to cut them due to cost. Turns out that Carpenter had a pretty keen eye on what could bear cutting -- most of this new stuff isn't terribly interesting, but I discovered a few nuggets. VINDICATED!! (Me, sorta) Naturally, whenever you read new primary material, your first instinct is to check to see if anything contradicts something you've said in print ... especially biographically. Well, I've made three big "biographical" claims, and here's my sigh of relief: Concerning my claim that, in 1954, Tolkien and colleagues contrived to create CS Lewis's academic chair at Cambridge in exchange for them nominating EM Forster for the Nobel Prize. Nothing in  Letters  supports or contradicts this. In my recent article for  Notes & Queries ,
Read more

Uncovering CS Lewis's First Religious Poem

 So, with my article's official acceptance by the journal English Text Construction , it's time to let the cat out of the bag. Using a combination of metrical analysis and biography, I've ascertained with near perfect certainty the first religious poem C. S. Lewis poem ever wrote .... a short poem, "Sweet Desire," that scholars have never previously paid any attention to. This poem is firmly datable to early 1930, probably January or February is my guess, and given the poem's subject matter, it's clearly talking about CSL's fears and intellectual trepidation about becoming a theist and abandoning atheism for good. It's basically Lewis's version of Caedmon's Hymn . The full metrical details will have to await my article, but one interesting caveat on my claims to firstness. In my peer reviewer's commentary, they recommended I contact a CSL scholar named  Charlie W. Starr, who's been working on Lewis's handwriting for quite a lon
Read more