Rumblings at the U of A

So, I've been avoided posting about the troubles faced by the University of Arizona. Already coming into this semester, we knew our particular college (Social and Behavioral Sciences) was going to a $5 or $6 million dollar shortfall . . . and then coronavirus hit.

 Given that the U of A receives about half of its tuition dollars from out-of-state and international students, whose enrollments are predicted to decline precipitously for Fall 2020 the university is obviously in dire financial straits. To address this situation, upper admin is 
  • (A) introducing mandatory furloughs on all employees of at least 10%. Since teachers are not allowed to let the quality of their teaching suffer, faculty whose jobs consist entirely of teaching (like us lecturers) are basically being given "pay cuts", a phrase admin is apparently reluctant to use.
  • (B) A hiring freeze, and offering admission to fewer potential graduate students.
  • (C) Increased course caps for Writing Program courses . .. from 19 to ??. We still don't know. I've been hearing dark rumors that we should consider course caps of 25 students max a win.
  • (D) outright layoffs. In theory, furloughing faculty is supposed to prevent layoffs, but not this time.
So, obviously, our Writing Program will be heavily impacted. In our worse case scenario (drastically lowered enrollments, course caps raised ultra high), 40 out of 54 lecturers, including yours truly, could have their contracts non-renewed. Yes, that's right -- our Writing Program could be decimated, even though we won an award from CCCC less than three years ago.

Obviously, it's a time of high stress for us all. I'll keep everyone posted.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall
Read more

A Good Week For Publication

So, wow. The Journal of Tolkien Research has just published my article, " Harken Not to Wild Beasts: Between Rage and Eloquence in Saruman and Thrasymachus ." What astounds me is that I finished the piece only two weeks ago and already got back the peer reviews. Of course, no real reason WHY the review process has to take months, but it just usually does. Kudos to the anonymous reviewers, great praise upon them, for working so quickly. I might even more appreciative of their promptness than of their kind remarks; I barely had to do any revisions to the article. The process went so fast, in fact, that the publication barely feels real. One of the great advantages of an online open-access journal, too, is instantaneous publication. As I'm learning with the several other articles I have in circulation, the publication process generally takes even longer than the review process. Anyway, this has been a good week. I finished my review of Harry Potter essays, and the edito
Read more