Poul Anderson's College Transcripts

So, I've been doing a lot of work recently on Poul Anderson as part of my R. D. Mullen Postdoctoral Research Fellowship from Science Fiction Studies. Basically, besides Tolkien, Poul Anderson is probably the most important SFF writer of the 20th-century alliterative revival. I know he grew up bilingual (English and Danish), and he did translations from Old Norse . . . but when and where, exactly, did he ever learn Old Norse? Did he take it in a college class, or did he learn it entirely on his own?

 So after doing some digging around, it finally occurred to me -- maybe I could just ask the University of Minnesota for his college transcripts.

 Turns out, I can do that . . . so I did.

 And now I'm looking at Poul Anderson's transcripts.

 A number of things leap out at me.
  1. First, they misspell his name Paul Anderson. This is funny, not only because a transcript is an official document, but because the draft programmer for ICFA made the same spelling mistake when he put my presentation title into the system. Notably, Poul's real name is pronounced somewhere halfway between "Paul" and "Poll," and it was almost impossible for native speakers of English to pronounce.
  2. Second, after Anderson graduated the UM in Winter 1948 (degree officially conferred on March 18th, 1948), apparently he want back to school part-time in Spring 1948, all 1950, and for parts of 1951 and 1952. This has never been mentioned in anything I've read about him. An aborted graduate degree, perhaps? Maybe, but somehow I doubt it. These post-graduate courses are split between math and philosophy. Notably, he didn't take any philosophy as an undergraduate, which brings me to . . . .
  3. . . . the dude was seriously into the hard sciences. Absolute no courses in the humanities appear on his undergrad transcript except for languages and two English classes . . . and one of those he withdraw from without completing. Otherwise, every course was math, chemistry, electrical engineering, and physics.
  4. Also, although Poul graduated with distinction, he did earn a grade of "D" in "Calculus IV Advanced." During his freshman year, he also received Cs in "Draw. 7, Desc. Geom" and "Draw. 8, Desc. Geom." I'm not exactly sure what those courses were (architecture, perhaps?), but since he never took another "Draw." class again, they evidently didn't suit him.
So, what about the big question -- languages? Well, turns out that Poul Anderson never did take any course in Old Norse or Old Scandinavian. I was already pretty sure he hadn't -- I'd found an old article in the journal Scandinavian Studies that confirmed that the U of M didn't teach those subjects, although they had courses in modern Swedish and contemporary Scandinavian literature. Instead, Anderson's two languages were German and Spanish.

All in all, quite the interesting little foray into primary research.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin...
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall...
Read more

NEW POETS OF RUM-RAM-RUF: Zach Weinersmith & Boulet

Image
In the opening paragraph of my metrical appendix to Speculative Poetry and the Modern Alliterative Revival , I raised a conundrum: how do revivalists today officially arrive at an alliterative meter? The question’s a good one. In every case known to me, at least in English, revivalists never “grow up” with alliterative poetics. They don’t – they cannot – know the meter on an intuitive cultural knowledge, not as medieval skalds or scopas did. In other words, the meter has been moribund for centuries, and if young poets today – those crazy kids – experiment with alliteration at all, it is only of the ornamental variety. That’s what tongue twisters teach you: the rum-ram-ruf of sounds jingle-jangling together. Accordingly, if revivalists know what they are doing at all, they deploy a poetic form learned only as an adult. Someday, though, I hope to eat those words – or at least chew them slowly. The parties responsible are author Zach Weinersmith and the artist Boulet, the creators of a w...
Read more