My 3-year Writing Productivity Report (2017-2020)

Academic efficiency is a topic that obsesses me. Although academic culture contains a fair amount of underground animosity against "productivity pressure" and the Protestant Work Ethic -- The Chronicle of Higher Education is full of it -- I'm still continually strategizing ways to be more efficient with my working time. This attitude has gotten me through grad school and a full-time contingent faculty position without any mental health issues, so there's that. Plus, I just love working for its own sake. 

 Anyway, here's my latest attempt at self-assessment. In my last year of grad school, I used to keep of yearly productivity record for my writing (see here and here). Once I began publishing regularly, though, I soon found yearly records impractical. After all, you can wait up to 11 months to get back a journal's reader's reports**, and the revisions sometimes take as long as the original submission.

 So, here's my first ever three-year productivity report. It tackles my publishable work from July 1st, 2017 through July 1st, 2020. That beginning date starts about two months after graduating my doctoral program at MTSU and, then, submitting my essay on J.R.R. Tolkien's nomination of E. M. Forster for the Nobel Prize to Mythlore. Hence, this report covers my University of Arizona period. During this time, I've been a NTT (non-tenure track) contingent faculty laboring on a 4-4 contract. 

 Final results? In three years or 1,096 days, I've produced

  • 14 articles (eleven of which are set for peer review)
  • 6 book reviews
  • 8 encyclopedia entries
  • 1 conference report, plus several conference presentations.
Taken all together, the word count for these writings equals 143,853 words. On average, that's 47,951 published words per year, and 131.25 publishable words per day. (Nota bene: I write every day, including weekends or holidays).

Takeaways? Well, first, I write a lot of 9,000 word articles. Second, putting that total word count into perspective, it equals about 2 monographs' worth of text during just three years. Third, I can't muster up much compassion for TT faculty on reduced teaching loads who complain about "productivity pressure."


For those who are interested, here's my breakdown of written work and word counts:

 ARTICLES
  • “Just like Henry James (Except with Cannibalism): The International Weird in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Rats in the Walls.’” Forthcoming in Gothic Studies. 
      • words: 6725
  • “Globalization, Depth, and the Domestic Hero: The Postmodern Transformation of Tolkien’s Bard in Peter Jackson’s Hobbit Trilogy.” Forthcoming in Tolkien Studies. 
      • words: 8046
  • “Utopias Unrealizable and Ambiguous: Plato, Strauss, and Le Guin’s The Dispossessed.” Forthcoming in Legacies of Ursula K. Le Guin, edited by Christopher Robinson, Sarah Bouttier, and Pierre-Louis Patoine. 
      • words: 6346
  • “History and Precarity: Glen Cook and the Rise of Picaresque Epic Fantasy.” Forthcoming in Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts
      • words: 9200
  • “The Image of Law in Donaldson’s ‘Reave the Just’: Agency, Blame, and Sexual Assault.” Law & Literature, vol. 32, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1-20.
      • words: 9160
  • “On Ways of Studying Tolkien: Notes Toward a Better (Epic) Fantasy Criticism.” Journal of Tolkien Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-25.
      • words: 10073
  • “‘Violations as Profound as any Rape’: Feminism and Sexed Violence in Stephen R. Donaldson.” Extrapolation, vol. 60, no. 2, 2019, pp. 133-56.
      • words: 9094
  • “Paul Edwin Zimmer’s Alliterative Style: A Metrical Legacy of J. R. R. Tolkien and Poul Anderson.” Mythlore, vol. 37, no. 1, 2018, pp. 183-201.
      • words: 8044
  • “Delving into Nome Man’s Land: Two Traditions in Baum and Tolkien.” Forthcoming in The Baum Bugle. (Non-peer reviewed)
      • words: 4821
  • “L. Frank Baum and PYRZQXGL: Or, How to Do Things with Magic Words.” Baum Bugle, vol. 63, no. 3, Winter 2019, pp. 7-16. (Non-peer reviewed)
      • words: 5039

ARTICLES UNDER REVIEW (these will require revision down the road, though I'm not anticipating big revisions)
  • “A Brief History of EPVIDS: Subjectivity and Evil Possessed Vampire Demon Swords.”
      • words: 8994
  • “The Hesitation Principle in ‘The Rats in the Walls.’”
      • words: 3952
  • “Poul Anderson and the American Pulp Alliterative Revival.”
      • words: 9511
  • “From Unknown to the Society for Creative Anachronism: The Alliterative Inheritance in Modern American Speculative Poetry.”
      • words: 9372
BOOK REVIEWS

  • The Shape of Fantasy: Investigating the Structure of American Heroic Epic Fantasy, by C. Palmer-Patel. Forthcoming in Fafnir: Nordic Journal of SFF Research.
    • words: 2114
  • “Unhuman, All-Too-Unhuman.” Rev. of None of This is Normal: The Fiction of Jeff VanderMeer, by Benjamin J. Robertson, Extrapolation, vol. 61, no. 1-2, pp. 238-42.
    • words: 1836
  • Sub-creating Arda: World-building in J. R. R. Tolkien’s Works, its Precursors, and its Legacies, edited by Dimitra Fimi and Thomas Honegger. Journal of Tolkien Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-9.
    • words: 3691
  • Okja (film), directed by Bong Joon-Ho. Science Fiction Film and Television, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 290-94, doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2019.16.
    • words: 1860
  • The Return of the Ring, volumes 1 & 2, edited by Lynn Forest-Hill. Journal of Tolkien Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
    • words: 5771
  • Alfred Bester, by Jad Smith. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 332-35.
    • words: 1490

ENCYCLOPEDIA ENTRIES

  • Poul Anderson, 2020, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2037
  • The Broken Sword, 2020, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2412
  • Peter S. Beagle, 2019, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 1612
  • The Last Unicorn, 2019, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2585
  • The Dispossessed, 2019, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2497
  • The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, 2018, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2521
  • Stephen R. Donaldson, 2018, The Literary Encyclopedia
    • words: 2522
  • “Donaldson’s Amnion and the Dangers of a Posthuman Future.” Aliens in Popular Culture, edited by Michael M. Levy and Farah Mendlesohn, Greenwood, pp. 107-09.
    • words: 1048
MISC. ACADEMIC WRITING

  • CONFERENCE REPORT: “Legacies of Ursula K. Le Guin—June 19th–21st, 2019.” Fafnir: Nordic Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019, pp. 132-34.
    • words count: 1480

CONFERENCE PAPERS (excluded from total word count)

  • “Unrealizable Ambiguous Utopias: Reading The Dispossessed through Leo Strauss and Plato.” Legacies of Ursula K. Le Guin: Science, Fiction, and Ethics for the Anthropocene. 
  • “Between Ancient and Modern: A Straussian Approach to Tolkien’s Medievalism.” IMC (International Medieval Congress). 
  • “‘Sing, Muse, the Wrath of Boromir, Denethor’s Son’: Thumos and Lofgeornost in J. R. R. Tolkien.” 53rd International Congress on Medieval Studies. 
  • “Gender Violence and Feminist Thought in Stephen R. Donaldson’s ‘Reave the Just.’” ICFA (International Conference for the Fantastic in the Arts). 

--------------------------
**Ahem, I'm looking at you, Gothic Studies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin...
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall...
Read more

NEW POETS OF RUM-RAM-RUF: Zach Weinersmith & Boulet

Image
In the opening paragraph of my metrical appendix to Speculative Poetry and the Modern Alliterative Revival , I raised a conundrum: how do revivalists today officially arrive at an alliterative meter? The question’s a good one. In every case known to me, at least in English, revivalists never “grow up” with alliterative poetics. They don’t – they cannot – know the meter on an intuitive cultural knowledge, not as medieval skalds or scopas did. In other words, the meter has been moribund for centuries, and if young poets today – those crazy kids – experiment with alliteration at all, it is only of the ornamental variety. That’s what tongue twisters teach you: the rum-ram-ruf of sounds jingle-jangling together. Accordingly, if revivalists know what they are doing at all, they deploy a poetic form learned only as an adult. Someday, though, I hope to eat those words – or at least chew them slowly. The parties responsible are author Zach Weinersmith and the artist Boulet, the creators of a w...
Read more