A nice mention in the Tolkien Studies Bibliography

So, having just received my copy of Tolkien Studies, I dropped everything (as one does) and immediately starting reading "The Year's Work in Tolkien Studies 2018", the year-end literature review of all things published on Tolkien during that calendar year. These literature reviews were a godsend to me as a graduate student, and they're absolutely vital for anyone hoping to keep up with the field.

Well, my essay on Verlyn Flieger's two YA novels published in A Wilderness of Dragons (ed. John Rateliff) as a Festschrift for Flieger, ended up getting some very nice coverage. Like, one-of-the-nicest-things-anyone's-ever-said-about-my-research coverage, which meant more both because it was so unexpected and because I assumed that this book chapter in particular would likely never be widely read. The review's worth quoting in full:

Dennis Wilson Wise drills deeper into Flieger's use of fantasy fiction to comment on her Tolkien scholarship in the most extensive essay of the four, "Identity, Time, and Faerie in Pig Tale and The Inn at Corbies' Caww: An Unexpected Convergence of Realms" (Rateliff 380-402). In a tour de force of analysis that begins by deprecating the value of critical interpretations of fairy-stories, Wise brings out the extremely intricate treatments of identity and Faerie in Flieger's paired titular novels. Taking Tolkien's Smith of Wootton Major as a starting point, he focuses almost entirely on Flieger's artistry in changing the relationships that Man can have with Faerie in ways that Tolkien never touched. She employs the time-travel and out-of-world theories of J. W. Dunne and contemporary themes of sex, identity, and universal selfhood, and concludes, Wise argues, with an attitude towards the possibilities of Man engaging with Faerie that is almost the opposite of Tolkien's. Be warned: as brilliant as it is to read, Wise's closely reasoned argument can be difficult to follow if one has not read the books themselves. (326-27).

Isn't that lovely? I immediately had to go re-read the book chapter, as it's been so long that I've half-forgotten the specific details of that piece. (As a sidenote, I'm now reminded of how much of my old philosophy of language classes have disappeared from memory.)

I feel like I should give the reviewer a gift basket, or something. :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony . And even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, I guarantee you'll never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two dis
Read more

Thoughts upon Reading Tolkien's New & Expanded LETTERS

So, I'm reading through the newly expanded version of Tolkien's Letters. One thing I hadn't properly realized is that these letters were part of Carpenter's original manuscript back in 1981, but Carpenter had to cut them due to cost. Turns out that Carpenter had a pretty keen eye on what could bear cutting -- most of this new stuff isn't terribly interesting, but I discovered a few nuggets. VINDICATED!! (Me, sorta) Naturally, whenever you read new primary material, your first instinct is to check to see if anything contradicts something you've said in print ... especially biographically. Well, I've made three big "biographical" claims, and here's my sigh of relief: Concerning my claim that, in 1954, Tolkien and colleagues contrived to create CS Lewis's academic chair at Cambridge in exchange for them nominating EM Forster for the Nobel Prize. Nothing in  Letters  supports or contradicts this. In my recent article for  Notes & Queries ,
Read more

Uncovering CS Lewis's First Religious Poem

 So, with my article's official acceptance by the journal English Text Construction , it's time to let the cat out of the bag. Using a combination of metrical analysis and biography, I've ascertained with near perfect certainty the first religious poem C. S. Lewis poem ever wrote .... a short poem, "Sweet Desire," that scholars have never previously paid any attention to. This poem is firmly datable to early 1930, probably January or February is my guess, and given the poem's subject matter, it's clearly talking about CSL's fears and intellectual trepidation about becoming a theist and abandoning atheism for good. It's basically Lewis's version of Caedmon's Hymn . The full metrical details will have to await my article, but one interesting caveat on my claims to firstness. In my peer reviewer's commentary, they recommended I contact a CSL scholar named  Charlie W. Starr, who's been working on Lewis's handwriting for quite a lon
Read more