Completed: my Brit Lit I survey course for Fall2022

Finally completed -- every single lesson plan for the Brit Lit I (Beowulf to Milton) course I'm teaching this fall. ... although technically, it's called "British and American Literature: From Beowulf to 1660." Anyway, there's 31,000 words of text in the document, plus one detailed PowerPoint to help explain the Gael/Briton/ Celtic/Anglo-Saxon thing (something that's always perplexed me about early British history), and of course all my quizzes set-up in D2L.

Normally, working this far ahead seems crazy to me, but the subject matter is still unfamiliar enough that I decided to forego the standard week-by-week route .... and, honestly, I needed to see the shape of my entire course before even finalizing a reading list. I never imagined that I would need three weeks for Chaucer, for instance ....

I'm truly amazed, though, at some of the possibilities created by this course's parameters. For instance, the combination of British and American literature in a survey course is not something I've seen before, but it allows me to pair Bartolome de las Casas with Spenser's A View on the State of Ireland, which forms an interesting conjunction between colonialism in Ireland and in the Americas. Likewise, I can pair John Milton with The Day of Doom by Michael Wigglesworth, the American Puritan.

What's even more astounding, at least for me, is just how much I remember from my survey course in British Literature, which I took during my freshman year at Lycoming College back in Fall 1997. I didn't even like that course -- the professor was a snappy dresser, but widely disliked -- and I only got something like a B-. Still, besides introducing me to Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which remains my all-time favorite piece of medieval literature, it's mesmerizing how many ideas and themes for this course arose like ghosts from that old one. As I was researching "Beowulf to 1660," I've thought more about that old class's texts and themes than I ever have before. Memory's a weird thing.

-------
EDIT P.S. As an addendum to the last two paragraphs, one of the texts I'm using, which was also used by my 1997 Brit Lit course, is Marlowe's The Tragedy of Doctor Faustus. Early in the play, when Faustus summons Mephistopheles, he of course first appears as a devil. When Faustus objects, Mephistopheles rematerializes as a friar, which of course Faustus thinks is hilarious. Well, because in my class we've just read the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales two weeks earlier, students will know a little something about monks and friars .... and thus Marlowe's joke is going to make more sense. It's these nice little connections, too, that have really made researching this course worthwhile.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall
Read more

A Good Week For Publication

So, wow. The Journal of Tolkien Research has just published my article, " Harken Not to Wild Beasts: Between Rage and Eloquence in Saruman and Thrasymachus ." What astounds me is that I finished the piece only two weeks ago and already got back the peer reviews. Of course, no real reason WHY the review process has to take months, but it just usually does. Kudos to the anonymous reviewers, great praise upon them, for working so quickly. I might even more appreciative of their promptness than of their kind remarks; I barely had to do any revisions to the article. The process went so fast, in fact, that the publication barely feels real. One of the great advantages of an online open-access journal, too, is instantaneous publication. As I'm learning with the several other articles I have in circulation, the publication process generally takes even longer than the review process. Anyway, this has been a good week. I finished my review of Harry Potter essays, and the edito
Read more