My Last Issue as Reviews Editor for FAFNIR

That's a wrap, folk. Our latest issue of Fafnir, volume 9, number 2, has just been published, and that's officially my last horrah with the journal. It's been a pretty rewarding time overall. Over the course of the last five years, I've had the opportunity to work with some fantastic editors and, of course, reviewers. In fact, it's probably been working with the reviewers themselves that I'll remember best about this experience. Although I'm closing out my tenure with relief -- the burnout was starting to get to me -- I'm still immensely proud of everything we've managed to accomplish these past five years.

Anyway, here are the highlights and personal accomplishments:

  • Developing the reviews section from scratch. 
    • We went from having 0-1 reviews per issue to about 6-11 per issue under my tenure.
  • Ushering almost 100 reviews to publication, oftentimes through several drafts.
    • Many reviews were from graduate students and Early Career Researchers. 
    • Worked with reviewers from five different continents and around (I think) ten different countries, including India and South Africa.
  • Creating official guidelines for reviews
  • Leading the initiative on creating a style sheet for Fafnir
  • Leading the initiative on Fafnir's redesigned layout
    • This launched with issue 6.1 and then was applied retroactively to issues 5.1 and 5.2.
  • Getting Fafnir its membership into the Directory of Open-Access Journals (the big ticket item), plus also smaller things like SHERPA/RoMEO and the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.
  • Helping editor-in-chief Laura E. Goodin  professionalize our journal's copy-editing standards; personally, I checked the formatting for MLA in-text citations and the MLA works cited page.
Oh, and this is worthy of mention as well:
  • Winning a WORLD FANTASY AWARD in 2020!
I'll always be slightly -- okay, deeply -- disappointed that, as "only" the reviews editor, I didn't have my name on the official award, but I like to think that my contributions were a big part of why Fafnir became such a phenomenal international venue in which to publish SFF research. Nonetheless, I come away with a ton of good stories and experiences, and there's absolutely nothing I regret about these last five years in academic publishing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin...
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall...
Read more

NEW POETS OF RUM-RAM-RUF: Zach Weinersmith & Boulet

Image
In the opening paragraph of my metrical appendix to Speculative Poetry and the Modern Alliterative Revival , I raised a conundrum: how do revivalists today officially arrive at an alliterative meter? The question’s a good one. In every case known to me, at least in English, revivalists never “grow up” with alliterative poetics. They don’t – they cannot – know the meter on an intuitive cultural knowledge, not as medieval skalds or scopas did. In other words, the meter has been moribund for centuries, and if young poets today – those crazy kids – experiment with alliteration at all, it is only of the ornamental variety. That’s what tongue twisters teach you: the rum-ram-ruf of sounds jingle-jangling together. Accordingly, if revivalists know what they are doing at all, they deploy a poetic form learned only as an adult. Someday, though, I hope to eat those words – or at least chew them slowly. The parties responsible are author Zach Weinersmith and the artist Boulet, the creators of a w...
Read more