"Swiiing, batta, batta": Editor of FOUNDATION

Ah, shucks .... another swing and a miss! Once upon a time, years ago, I wrote about "Golden Opportunity Nearly Missed (But Nonetheless Flubbed"), my first application to become a co-editor at Fafnir. As it happened, I re-applied the following year, and although still wasn't selected, the committee liked me enough to make me the journal's first-ever reviews editor, which I happily did for five years. (And we won a World Fantasy Award in the process!)

Ever since leaving Fafnir, though, I've kept my eyes half-peeled for further editorial opportunities. Even got an offer from MOSF Journal of Science Fiction, although I did end up declining that offer because I wasn't interested in doing reviews again .... Been there, done that, as they say.

Anyway, last spring, I saw that Paul March-Russell of Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction was stepping down as editor after a 10+ years, so once again threw my name into the hat.

And was very pleasantly surprised to be short-listed for an interview. Things went quite well .... but, alas, Foundation eventually landed on another strong candidate, Professor Nick Hubble. That was just announced yesterday. 

Still, I'm honored to have been considered as a finalist. I know that being a journal editor is much like being the manager of a Major League baseball team. There's tons of qualified candidates ... but few openings. But I'll keep trying with my fingers crossed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, he had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than Anne McCaffrey, the next most frequent bestseller. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  21 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" nine.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distinct...
Read more

My reviews for WOOFUS TAKES and THE BEALLSVILLE CALENDAR

In my ongoing efforts to support alliterative poets in the Modern Alliterative Revival, I just added online reviews for two more poets: Michael Helsem (aka, "Graywyvern") and Jeff Sypeck. These are below, but if you 'd like to support the revivalist, click on the reviews below and "upvote" them ... it's very handy for the algorithms! Lancelot Schaubert ( The Greenwood Poet ): my  Amazon review  and my  Goodreads review  . Adam Bolivar ( Ballads for the Witching Hour ): my  Amazon review  and my  Goodreads review  . Amit Majmudar ( Dothead ): my  Amazon review  and my  Goodreads review Mary Thaler ( Ulfhidr ): my  Amazon review  and my  Goodreads review Zach Weinersmith ( Bea Wolf ): my  Amazon review  and this  Goodreads review Now for Helsem and Sypeck!
Read more

Defending Del Rey Books: The Misunderstood Hero

Image
A friend just sent me a youtube video "guaranteed to piss me off" (as he says) ... and boy oh boy, was he right. Now, I don't wanna dunk too hard on a random, passionate, sincere fantasy fan with a youtube channel. Since I'm writing a book on this exact topic, though, it's worth spelling out the myriad things problematic with " This is Why We Never Got Another Lord of the Rings ", a 30-minute hit job on Del Rey Books by a young youtuber named Hilary Layne, whose handle is "The Second Story". First, though, let me state for the record I think Layne makes a relatively solid attempt at research, at least for a non-academic. For the most part, she gets historical facts right, and she clearly put some legwork into tracking down sources. (She even briefly screenshots my article on Judy-Lynn , albeit without addressing my arguments.) Nonetheless, how Layne interprets her historical facts -- that is, the story she tells -- is what should raise red flag...
Read more