The Situation at JFA

Looks like there's a massive hot mess at Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts right now.

Last summer, Brian Attebery announced his retirement after 16 years, and the Board then issued a call for a new "editorial collective."

"Well," I thought, "this is exciting! I have a ton of publishing experience, including five years of editorial experience, plus a World Fantasy Award, so I'll apply ... JFA would be a dream job." So I spent three work-days pouring my heart and soul into an application letter. It's some of my best writing ... for what it's worth, here it is.

Despite my qualifications, I nonetheless kind of knew I had no real chance. First, I'm an outsider to the IAFA community -- no real connections, and I'm not good at socializing with random people at conferences. Still, I'd heard enough buzz to guess that JFA was looking hard to diversify .... and I know academia well enough to know that my kinds of diversity (working class, first-generation, contingent laborer, low-ranked doctoral program) aren't normally considered as "diverse." So it came as no surprise when, after a follow-up inquiry, a Board member told me this: "Had it been simply based on qualifications, you'd be at the top of the list. We went with people who had very concrete ideas about reinventing (and especially diversifying) the journal." 

I appreciate the non-form-letter response, but also suspected that my particular subject position -- straight white male -- would count against me. Mind you, I'm making no complaints or critiques here. Still, my philosophy is just to try keeping my head down, and hope that scholars like me can publish their way into a tenure-track jobs, prestigious service positions, and the like. Overall, I still believe meritocracy is real.

Anyway. Last night, I saw via facebook that the new JFA board just unceremoniously dumped their reviews editor without warning. This editor, who is white, nonetheless had over 10+ years of volunteer experience with JFA and an impressive publication record. He's also worked hard to diversify the books reviewed by the journal. Yet none of that seems to have mattered, and he was replaced by someone without any experience. By way of explanation, though, this editor was then told that his removal was due to JFA trying "to racially desegregate [the journal's] decision-making bodies."

As you might imagine given his years of service, he views this as a personal betrayal, one based on his "ethnicity and sexual orientation" (his quote), and it's hard to disagree. In addition, although I'm obviously not privy to any insider details, it also seems as if Attebery has chosen to immediately cease all association with the journal in protest.

All this is very, very disheartening.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony . And even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, I guarantee you'll never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two dis
Read more

Thoughts upon Reading Tolkien's New & Expanded LETTERS

So, I'm reading through the newly expanded version of Tolkien's Letters. One thing I hadn't properly realized is that these letters were part of Carpenter's original manuscript back in 1981, but Carpenter had to cut them due to cost. Turns out that Carpenter had a pretty keen eye on what could bear cutting -- most of this new stuff isn't terribly interesting, but I discovered a few nuggets. VINDICATED!! (Me, sorta) Naturally, whenever you read new primary material, your first instinct is to check to see if anything contradicts something you've said in print ... especially biographically. Well, I've made three big "biographical" claims, and here's my sigh of relief: Concerning my claim that, in 1954, Tolkien and colleagues contrived to create CS Lewis's academic chair at Cambridge in exchange for them nominating EM Forster for the Nobel Prize. Nothing in  Letters  supports or contradicts this. In my recent article for  Notes & Queries ,
Read more

Uncovering CS Lewis's First Religious Poem

 So, with my article's official acceptance by the journal English Text Construction , it's time to let the cat out of the bag. Using a combination of metrical analysis and biography, I've ascertained with near perfect certainty the first religious poem C. S. Lewis poem ever wrote .... a short poem, "Sweet Desire," that scholars have never previously paid any attention to. This poem is firmly datable to early 1930, probably January or February is my guess, and given the poem's subject matter, it's clearly talking about CSL's fears and intellectual trepidation about becoming a theist and abandoning atheism for good. It's basically Lewis's version of Caedmon's Hymn . The full metrical details will have to await my article, but one interesting caveat on my claims to firstness. In my peer reviewer's commentary, they recommended I contact a CSL scholar named  Charlie W. Starr, who's been working on Lewis's handwriting for quite a lon
Read more