I've Gone Viral (Judy-Lynn del Rey Edition)

Well well well! So, it seems that my article on Judy-Lynn del Rey for The Conversation, "The woman who revolutionized the fantasy genre is finally getting her due," has now climbed to over 150,000+ pageviews ... which means that I've now "gone viral," as the kids say.

I'd originally written the article almost spur of the moment, realizing that the PBS documentary on which I served as a research consultant, "Judy-Lynn del Rey: The Galaxy Gal," was going to premiere on October 1st. So I wanted to create some publicity for that, and just happened to know about The Conversation. 

I've gotten a lot of extremely positive feedback about the article, too, and it's all very bemusing, especially for someone used to spending months on research articles that might garner one or two dozen readers, tops.

Anyway, here's a few random reflections on going viral:
  • Nobody looks at the writer's byline. One friend of mine posted the article onto a listserv we're both on ... never realizing I was the author.
  • Likewise, my website hasn't seen any increased traffic from people searching my name, although, to be fair, The Conversation has its own profile for me.
  • Finally, nobody clicks the internal hyperlinks that offer substantiating evidence. One of my internal links went to this blog, but out of those 150K+ page views, fewer than 200 people looked at it.
All in all, though, this has been an ultra cool experience .... and if anybody in publishing deserves greater recognition, it's Judy-Lynn del Rey. So I'm glad to have done that.

Comments

  1. Marcel R. BüllesOctober 15, 2024 at 3:47 AM

    I am glad to say I will be jumping the bandwagon with the next Roving Ranger edition, having enjoyed your article thoroughly - I, for one, did not know that she was a "woman with dwarfism" which opens up another perspective I was not aware of. Thanks for this!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Genre Fantasy Bestsellers through 1990

Image
I've been studying Keith Justice's Bestseller Index , which compiles information from two separate bestseller lists -- New York Times Book Review and Publishers Weekly -- up through 1990, and the results are ridiculously fascinating. For instance, you wanna take a stab at which SFF author has the most individual books appear on a bestseller list? No, it ain't Heinlein, Clark, Herbert, or Asimov. It's not even Terry Brooks or David Eddings. No, the answer is Piers Anthony ... and even if you somehow pulled that name out of thin air, you'll still never guess how truly dominate Anthony was. Up through 1990, Anthony had more than double than number of distinct bestsellers than the next most frequent bestseller, Anne McCaffrey. Whereas Anthony had an astounding  22 different books appear on a bestseller list, McCaffrey had "only" 9.** Now, caveats. These numbers need to be taken with one (or two) grains of salt. For instance, although Anthony had 22 two distin
Read more

A Look at Charles R. Saunders and "Sword & Soul"

Image
So, I've been reading lately about Charles R. Saunders, the black author of sword-and-sorcery fiction, and man .... poor guy. If there's been ever a case of someone being born about 30 years too soon, it's Saunders. Usually, when people mention about black S&S authors, they mean Samuel R. Delany. This makes sense. As a queer, Marxist deconstructionist, Delany established his street cred first by writing SF before wading into the "gutters" (ahem) of S&S fantasy. (Sidenote: are there any black fantasy writers except maybe Jemisin who didn't first establish their street cred by writing SF?). Although I personally never much cared for Delany's  writing style or Nevèrÿon books , which are basically what happens when someone who holds a subgenre in contempt decides to write in that subgenre, it is true that academic critics love Delany .... especially critics who hate S&S themselves. So if they mention Saunders at all, which is rare, it's usuall
Read more

A Good Week For Publication

So, wow. The Journal of Tolkien Research has just published my article, " Harken Not to Wild Beasts: Between Rage and Eloquence in Saruman and Thrasymachus ." What astounds me is that I finished the piece only two weeks ago and already got back the peer reviews. Of course, no real reason WHY the review process has to take months, but it just usually does. Kudos to the anonymous reviewers, great praise upon them, for working so quickly. I might even more appreciative of their promptness than of their kind remarks; I barely had to do any revisions to the article. The process went so fast, in fact, that the publication barely feels real. One of the great advantages of an online open-access journal, too, is instantaneous publication. As I'm learning with the several other articles I have in circulation, the publication process generally takes even longer than the review process. Anyway, this has been a good week. I finished my review of Harry Potter essays, and the edito
Read more